Nobama, Part 6,247

From the comments at AT.

Can we now call the demagoguery we used to impune [sic!] Hillary over NAFTA simply “overheated rhetoric”…..

“YES WE CAN”!

Can we reverse our support for gun control laws, and their concomitant ideology…..

“YES WE CAN”

Can we reverse our position on the death penalty….

“YES WE CAN”!

Can we reverse our position on public financing of political campaigns, and offer a series of lame excuses that insult our intelligence…..

“YES WE CAN”!

Can we throw anyone who we have previously allied with, for political expedience, under the bus, once they become embarrassing, unpopular, or simply are no longer useful…..

“YES WE CAN”!

Can we suddenly decide that we must have preconditions before meeting with Ahmedi-Najad; WHEN WE PUBLICLY STATED THAT NONE WERE REQUIRED BEFORE…….

“YES WE CAN”!

Can we do whatever it takes to gain power in the fall……

“YES WE CAN”!

Can we do everything in our power to conceal our Marxist agenda, with the help of the mainstream media, by appearing to be a moderate…….

“YES WE CAN”!

Money quote follows:

What a pusillanimous, palavering, popinjay….

And the call to action.

Can we do all we can to defeat comrade Obama in the fall……

“YES WE CAN”!!!!!!!

 Pusillanimous, Palavering Popinjay – hilarious.

The Death of the University

An update on this story.

Last week, in an article published here on FrontPageMag, I told this story of how the high priests of diversity rejected truth and God at what is billed as the “Largest Catholic University in America.” My article was published as the Task Force released its Guiding Principles of Free Speech and Expression, now scrubbed clean of anything “offensive.” In a university-wide email, the Task Force told students, faculty, and staff that it was “actively gathering input on the draft Guiding Principles from the broadest possible spectrum of voices within the university community.” I chose to publish my input on FrontPageMag.com.

As soon as my article appeared, the Diversity Council held a meeting with the president of the University and the Task Force. They demanded that something be done about the troublemaker, namely me. I pointed out that there had been no confidentiality agreement and the Guiding Principles had already been released. But they argued that members would no longer feel comfortable participating out of fear that whatever they say may be published. It was apparently inappropriate for me to hold these individuals accountable for their ideas. I could have been given a warning not to publish anything in the future without consent of the Task Force, which would have protected their sensibilities. But just as the race card helped to derail the Guiding Principles themselves, so now it sealed my fate. I ought to be ashamed, they told me, because the members of the Task Force named in my article were people of color. In other words, people of color are above criticism and my concern for free speech and the betrayal of its principles was essentially racist.

For President Holtschneider this was all he needed to hear. Each and every time an incident like this occurs, the administration buckles to the pressure of the diversity agenda; this time was no exception. Under apparent duress from the Diversity Council, I was informed that I would no longer be welcome on the Free Speech and Expression Task Force. So much for free speech.