<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We ARE — and Shall Remain — UNDER GOD!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newdefender.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/we-are-%e2%80%94-and-shall-remain-%e2%80%94-under-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newdefender.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/we-are-%e2%80%94-and-shall-remain-%e2%80%94-under-god/</link>
	<description>The best defense is to be good and offensive...or something like that.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Godefroi</title>
		<link>http://newdefender.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/we-are-%e2%80%94-and-shall-remain-%e2%80%94-under-god/#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>Godefroi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newdefender.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/we-are-%e2%80%94-and-shall-remain-%e2%80%94-under-god/#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re missing the point.  

Many of our oldest edifices in this country have references to God and/or the Bible.  The assertion that they don&#039;t belong there, or that they are even unconstitutional, is ridiculous. 

The idea that we understand the intent of the framers of the Constitution better now, 220 years later, than did those who lived during the time it was written, is hubris of monumental proportions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re missing the point.  </p>
<p>Many of our oldest edifices in this country have references to God and/or the Bible.  The assertion that they don&#8217;t belong there, or that they are even unconstitutional, is ridiculous. </p>
<p>The idea that we understand the intent of the framers of the Constitution better now, 220 years later, than did those who lived during the time it was written, is hubris of monumental proportions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolfger</title>
		<link>http://newdefender.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/we-are-%e2%80%94-and-shall-remain-%e2%80%94-under-god/#comment-1535</link>
		<dc:creator>wolfger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newdefender.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/we-are-%e2%80%94-and-shall-remain-%e2%80%94-under-god/#comment-1535</guid>
		<description>No. I don&#039;t support them. Any group that defends &quot;under God&quot; in the pledge by talking about &quot;time honored traditions&quot; is just too uneducated for me to support. The original pledge did not say &quot;under God&quot;. If you care about &quot;time honored traditions&quot;, you&#039;ll support removing this very recent alteration of our great country&#039;s pledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. I don&#8217;t support them. Any group that defends &#8220;under God&#8221; in the pledge by talking about &#8220;time honored traditions&#8221; is just too uneducated for me to support. The original pledge did not say &#8220;under God&#8221;. If you care about &#8220;time honored traditions&#8221;, you&#8217;ll support removing this very recent alteration of our great country&#8217;s pledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
